Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR?
Date: 2006-04-17 14:28:05
Message-ID: 200604171428.k3HES5w08619@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman ( at ) candle ( dot ) pha ( dot ) pa ( dot ) us> writes:
> > I am thinking we should throw an error on pg_start_backup() and
> > pg_stop_backup if full_page_writes is off.
>
> No, we'll just change the test in xlog.c so that fullPageWrites is
> ignored if XLogArchivingActive.
>
> > Seems archive_command and
> > full_page_writes can still be used if we are not in the process of doing
> > a file system backup.
>
> Think harder: we are only safe if the first write to a given page after
> it's mis-copied by the archiver is a full page write. The requirement
> therefore continues after pg_stop_backup. Unless you want to add
> infrastructure to keep track for *every page* in the DB of whether it's
> been fully written since the last backup?

I am confused. Since we checkpoint during pg_start_backup(), isn't any
write to a file while the tar backup is going on going to be a full page
write? And once we pg_stop_backup(), do we need full page writes?

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-04-17 14:35:26 Re: Google SoC--Idea Request
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-17 14:06:54 Re: A successor for PQgetssl