Re: Postgresql Certifications.

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, luckysharma(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Postgresql Certifications.
Date: 2006-04-17 12:54:01
Message-ID: 200604170854.02016.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Monday 17 April 2006 08:36, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> > Marc already did.
>
> I admit, registering the trademark is valid for legal reasons. I was
> making a point of absurdity.
>

That is is better to allow companies like microsoft or mysql to become the
defacto oraganization for getting "postgresql-anything" rather than allowing
the established postgresql community to have some influence over things?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-17 13:28:09 Re: Postgresql Certifications.
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-04-17 12:36:01 Re: Postgresql Certifications.