Re: which is the best

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: slackman(at)unika(dot)ac(dot)id
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: which is the best
Date: 2006-04-17 03:18:01
Message-ID: 20060417031801.GA37181@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:42:59AM +0700, slackman(at)unika(dot)ac(dot)id wrote:
> Now I have 3 database A,B,C is working in Interbase v 5.6,
> but Interbas v 5.6 is no longger can hold what the client wants,
> I will conver it in Postgresql, I need your advice which is the
> bertter result:
>
> (1):
> unika (schema)
> |
> |------ A
> |------------ B
> |------------------- C
>
> (2) create database A, create database B, create database C

Which way is "better" depends on your access patterns. PostgreSQL
doesn't support cross-database queries (except via functions like
dblink), so if you need to join tables in one database with tables
in another then you'll probably want make A, B, and C schemas in
the same database. But if A, B, and C have no relationship with
one another then you might want to isolate them as separate databases.

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Danish 2006-04-17 08:16:09 tsearch2 installation problem
Previous Message slackman 2006-04-17 03:05:46 sorry which is the best