Re: inet value validation

From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inet value validation
Date: 2006-04-16 17:48:13
Message-ID: 20060416174813.GC5088@KanotixBox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

pgsql-general(at)list(dot)coretech(dot)ro <pgsql-general(at)list(dot)coretech(dot)ro> schrieb:

>
> yes, this is a good example, but I do not want to use an exception block
> because of the warning present on documentation regarding exception blocks

No problem, i want to show a transaction-secure solution. You can use
this without the exception block, but if you got a error, a transaction
will be failed.

> Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> >pgsql-general(at)list(dot)coretech(dot)ro <pgsql-general(at)list(dot)coretech(dot)ro> schrieb:
> >
> >>hello,

Argh. Please no silly fullquote below the text.

Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nik 2006-04-16 20:00:29 Re: Comparing text field
Previous Message pgsql-general@list.coretech.ro 2006-04-16 17:16:18 Re: inet value validation