Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with
Date: 2006-04-16 16:33:07
Message-ID: 20060416163307.GC6591@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:31:58PM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > (No, I don't think tar's blocksize options control this
> > necessarily --- those indicate the blocking factor on the *tape*.
> > And not everyone uses tar anyway.)
>
> If I'm desperate enough to get the 2x reduction of WAL writes, I may
> even write my own backup solution.

I must be missing something obvious, but why don't we compress the
xlogs? They appear to be quite compressable (>75%) with standard gzip...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-04-16 18:34:10 Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-16 15:48:02 Re: Regrading TODO item alerting pg_hba.conf from SQL