Re: Control File

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruno Almeida do Lago <teolupus(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Control File
Date: 2006-04-15 19:03:50
Message-ID: 20060415190350.GE49405@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:10:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > As for adding checks to startup scripts, that's a PITA because
> > those scripts will have no idea of where tablespaces might be defined,
> > so you'd have to hard-code that info in.
<snip>
> OTOH you could argue that it'd be just as reasonable for the postmaster
> to make this check, seeing that it does go to the trouble of verifying
> the contents of $PGDATA/PG_VERSION.

Yup. Plus it seems rather silly to expect every port/package of
PostgreSQL to add code to check for functional tablespace mounts.

Perhaps an easy means would be to put a PG_VERSION file in each
tablespace when it's created and then check all of them. Tablespaces
arguably make it slightly easier to accidentally try and mount something
from a different version...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-04-15 19:05:20 Google SoC--Idea Request
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-04-15 18:35:14 Re: Time for new releases?