From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? |
Date: | 2006-04-15 15:55:03 |
Message-ID: | 200604151555.k3FFt3722965@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am thinking we should throw an error on pg_start_backup() and
> > pg_stop_backup if full_page_writes is off.
>
> No, we'll just change the test in xlog.c so that fullPageWrites is
> ignored if XLogArchivingActive.
We should probably throw a LOG message too.
> > Seems archive_command and
> > full_page_writes can still be used if we are not in the process of doing
> > a file system backup.
>
> Think harder: we are only safe if the first write to a given page after
> it's mis-copied by the archiver is a full page write. The requirement
> therefore continues after pg_stop_backup. Unless you want to add
> infrastructure to keep track for *every page* in the DB of whether it's
> been fully written since the last backup?
Ah, yea.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-04-15 16:54:39 | Time for new releases? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 15:49:18 | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? |