Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Ted Byers <r(dot)ted(dot)byers(at)rogers(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S
Date: 2006-04-12 19:02:19
Message-ID: 20060412190219.GH22456@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:53:01PM -0400, Ted Byers wrote:
> I take it that "RAID 1+0" refers to a combination of Raid 1 and RAID 0.
> What about RAID 10? I am curious because RAID 10 has come out since the
> last time I took a look at RAID technology. I am not sure what it actually
> does differently from RAID 5.

AIUI, RAID 10 = RAID 1+0. Lame, I know. Similarly, some people have
invented RAID 50 = RAID 5+0.

Not sure if that's the official definition though, but that's the way
I've seen it used.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoffrey 2006-04-12 19:13:03 Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S
Previous Message Ted Byers 2006-04-12 18:53:01 Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S