Re: pgfoundry and gborg

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pgfoundry and gborg
Date: 2006-04-12 22:01:10
Message-ID: 20060412185910.O1096@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>>
>>> As I said above, if you can spend the time to give me a clean "per
>>> project" script, I have to problems with doing the "per project"
>>> migration ...
>>
>> Sounds like a plan.
>>
>> Question, again: am I correct that it will be easier to migrate mailman and
>> CVS *before* moving to the new server, rather than after?
>
> I'd say about the same ... rsync can be used in either case ... but, both
> being on the local network will eliminate any network delay ... its your call
> though ...

Appendum: but, we don't know how easy getting pgfoundry moved to the new
server is going to be yet ... we've done the file/ports stuff, but, as far
as I know, we haven't done any testing of the result (ie. run it live and
check for any issues) ... if you want to move it to the new server first,
let's concentrate on that and then worry about gborg->pgfoundry ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-04-12 22:23:39 Re: pgfoundry and gborg
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-04-12 21:58:55 Re: pgfoundry and gborg