Re: plpgsql by default

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Date: 2006-04-12 10:32:52
Message-ID: 200604121232.53706.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Dienstag, 11. April 2006 23:20 schrieb Tom Lane:
> In the end it's only one small component of security, but any security
> expert will tell you that you take all the layers of security that you
> can get.

I think what the security experts are saying is that you need a thorough
evaluation of assets, attackers, risks, and countermeasures, and I don't see
that here.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-12 10:54:30 Re: plpgsql by default
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2006-04-12 10:24:25 Re: RH9 postgresql 8.0.7 rpm