| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | C Storm <christian(dot)storm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgmemcache |
| Date: | 2006-04-11 22:55:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20060411225515.GZ49405@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:24:42AM -0700, C Storm wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone on the list has a successful installation of
> pgmemcache running
> that uses LISTEN/NOTIFY to signal a successfully completed transaction,
> i.e., to get around the fact
> that TRIGGERS are transaction unaware. Or perhaps any other
> information regarding a successful
> deployment of pgmemcache.
The problem with attempting that is that you'd have a window between
transaction commit and when the cache was invalidated. If that's
acceptable then it shouldn't be too difficult to set something up using
LISTEN/NOTIFY like you describe.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-11 22:59:14 | Re: freebsd/softupdates for data dir |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-11 22:49:59 | Re: Sequencial scan instead of using index |