| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql by default |
| Date: | 2006-04-11 21:54:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20060411185240.S1096@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Can you guarantee unequivocally that there are absolutely not security
>> issues in plpgsql?
>
> Can you guarantee unequivocally that there are absolutely not security issues
> in PostgreSQL?
No, but does that mean we should increase the potential by adding in
something that not everyone that runs PostgreSQL actually uses?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2006-04-11 21:57:08 | Re: plpgsql by default |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-11 21:36:04 | Re: Suboptimal evaluation of CASE expressions |