Re: Meaning of "loops" in EXPLAIN ANALYSE output

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Aaron Bingham <bingham(at)cenix-bioscience(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Meaning of "loops" in EXPLAIN ANALYSE output
Date: 2006-04-10 15:17:53
Message-ID: 20060410151753.GD22409@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:08:01PM +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Aaron Bingham wrote:
> >Unique (cost=9775.21..10015.32 rows=1 width=8) (actual
> >time=264.889..264.889 rows=1 loops=791)
> >
> >Does that mean that the entire operation took 264.889 ms, or that a
> >single iteration took that long? The time for the entire query would
> >suggest the latter interpretation
>
> You're quite right - multiply the time by the number of loop iterations
> to find the total.

Or rather, the time given is the total time divided by the number of
loops i.e. the average. It's done this way because the planning
estimate is also done on those terms (average per iteration not grand
total).

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-04-10 15:45:23 Re: pg_restore 7.4.7 locks itself out
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-04-10 15:08:01 Re: Meaning of "loops" in EXPLAIN ANALYSE output