Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases
Date: 2006-04-09 22:01:53
Message-ID: 20060409220153.GC16673@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Huh, I didn't suggest to dump/reload. I suggested CLUSTER. You need to
> > apply it only to tables where you have lots of dead tuples, which IIRC
> > are A, C and D.
>
> Sorry, I should read more carefully. Will clustering a table according
> to one index solve problems with all the indexes on the table (if the
> table has for example two indexes?).

Yes, it will rebuild all indexes.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message FavoYang 2006-04-10 03:43:40 slow "IN" clause
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2006-04-09 21:49:22 Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases