From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Undisclosed(dot)Recipients: ; |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Further SPI |
Date: | 2006-04-10 03:58:10 |
Message-ID: | 200604092058.10126.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Marc, Josh,
> It would be to SPI. I actually don't even know if SPI is in the US
> (although I am assuming it is). I was just making a point that the
> records have to be correct otherwise there could be some admistrative
> problems.
That's correct.
The basic approach is that you're donating to the SPI, making a "designated
gift" to either PostgreSQL or the PostgreSQL Anniversary. If the designation
is unclear (i.e. to "PG") then it would likely be necessary to contact the
giver by e-mail to confirm the destination. As long as both the
organization and the donor are clear on the designation at the time of
giving, it's not a problem for the IRS.
Of course, when we get our Click&Pledge account working, we won't have to rely
on people typing it into a blank. Which will be good.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-04-10 04:00:40 | Re: OSCON |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-04-09 17:05:33 | Re: OSCON |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-04-10 14:38:55 | new survey |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-04-09 16:24:44 | Re: Further SPI |