From: | Bill Moseley <moseley(at)hank(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | plgpsql and transactions |
Date: | 2006-04-06 18:36:09 |
Message-ID: | 20060406183608.GA8518@hank.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In a BEFORE INSERT trigger, depending on input values, I need to lock
a table and do a few selects. Of course, the "lock table" isn't much
use if not currently in a transaction.
So my question is this: can I tell if I'm inside a transaction or
not and issue a BEGIN if not. And then also set a flag so that after
the INSERT I can detect that I issued a BEGIN and do a COMMIT?
Or, maybe better is to just throw an exception if not already inside a
transaction.
BTW -- it seems odd to me that you can issue a lock table outside of
an explicit begin/commit and not get a warning. When would issuing a
lock table outside an explicit transaction be of any use?
--
Bill Moseley
moseley(at)hank(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wayne Schroeder | 2006-04-06 18:37:30 | The dangers of long running open transactions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-06 18:33:57 | Re: Unique constraint or index, case insensitive, on multiple fields |