Re: problem about maximum row size ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, zhaoxin <zhaox(at)necas(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)cn>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem about maximum row size ?
Date: 2006-04-03 13:41:14
Message-ID: 200604031341.k33DfEk21566@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> > Sent: 03 April 2006 04:41
> > To: Tom Lane
> > Cc: zhaoxin; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [ODBC] problem about maximum row size ?
> >
> > FAQ updated with new number, and mention that increasing
> > block size quadruples it.
>
> I've updated the limitations page on the website, though I didn't bother
> with the blocksize hack on there.
>
> Whilst we're on the subject, is 16TB for a table still correct given CE
> partitioning?

Uh, probably not, but do we want to require CE to increase that limit?

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-03 13:45:18 Re: problem about maximum row size ?
Previous Message Johann Zuschlag 2006-04-03 09:17:03 Re: Unicode is not UTF-8. was :psqlODBC-Driver Test / text