| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, freebsd-stable(at)freebsd(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: semaphore usage "port based"? |
| Date: | 2006-04-03 03:38:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20060403003619.L947@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> No-one is taking a position of being "uninterested", so please don't
> be hasty to reciprocate.
I just posted it off the -hackers list, but there is an ancient patch in
the FreeBSD queue for implementing Private IPCs for Jails ... not sure why
it was never committed, or what is involved in bring it up to speed with
the current 6.x and / or -current kernels though ... but, as I mentioned
in another thread, I know that *at least* Apache2 makes use of shared
memory for some of its stuff ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Scholes | 2006-04-03 03:39:31 | Re: WAL Bypass for indexes |
| Previous Message | Kris Kennaway | 2006-04-03 03:31:47 | Re: semaphore usage "port based"? |