From: | Bojidar Mihajlov <bmihajlov(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pg-dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Slony-I for circular replication |
Date: | 2006-03-30 13:34:30 |
Message-ID: | 20060330133430.67700.qmail@web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi All;
Can Slony-I be used for circular replication (A
<replicates> B <replicates> A)
or there is some kind of problem with locking or
anything else?
If I avoid insert conflicts will the following
scenario succeed for the updates :
A: X.balance-= 5
B: X.balance-= 3
A receives the update from B (X.balance -= 3)
B receives the update from A (X.balance -= 5)
or it will lead to deadlock ?
Nodes A and B will reside at different geografical
locations.
I'll use only node A to service both locations in the
most time and B for redundancy.
But the case of broken connection between node A and B
could lead to scenarios
like latter because then A and B will service their
own location. Could such a scenarios
be detected and logged ?
What happen in case of a conflict (dublicated primary
key/update deleted) ?
Could the performed action be managed ?
Regards,
Bozhidar Mihaylov
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-30 14:09:27 | Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-03-30 12:20:04 | COPY and read-only transactions |