| From: | Gorshkov <listsubscriptions(at)oghma(dot)on(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Decide between Postgresql and Mysql (help of |
| Date: | 2006-03-30 04:07:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200603292307.29034.listsubscriptions@oghma.on.ca |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:23, Craig A. James wrote:
> Gorshkov wrote:
> > /flame on
> > if you were *that* worried about performance, you wouldn't be using PHP
> > or *any* interperted language
> > /flame off
> >
> > sorry - couldn't resist it :-)
>
> I hope this was just a joke. You should be sure to clarify - there might
> be some newbie out there who thinks you are seriously suggesting coding
> major web sites in some old-fashioned compiled language.
>
well yes, it was meant as a joke ..... that's *usually* what a ";-)" means.
That being said ..... what *is* the difference between coding a website -
major or otherwise - in an "old-fashioned" compiled language and a
non-compiled language, except for the amount of hoursepower and memory you
require?
Old-fashioned doesn't mean bad, inappropriate, or inferior. It's just not the
latest-and-greatest, however it's currently defined by the geek fashion
police.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gorshkov | 2006-03-30 04:39:46 | Re: Decide between Postgresql and Mysql (help of |
| Previous Message | Brendan Duddridge | 2006-03-30 03:20:17 | Re: Query using SeqScan instead of IndexScan |