| From: | "Andy Shellam" <andy(dot)shellam(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Sriram Dandapani'" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL file naming convention |
| Date: | 2006-03-25 17:51:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20060325175125.0DB5E9DCE25@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
As PostgreSQL numbers WALs sequentially, as long as your ls command by
default orders listings by filename, then Yes. Or you could list by the
last modified date/time should give the same effect.
Andy
_____
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Sriram Dandapani
Sent: Saturday, 25 March, 2006 12:30 am
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [ADMIN] WAL file naming convention
Hi
Is is safe to assume that the unix ls command will return WAL files in the
same sequence as postgres creates them.
e.g will ls <wal-file-folder> return files in the order that postgres
created them
!DSPAM:14,44248f2235041511888239!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joost Kraaijeveld | 2006-03-25 19:23:17 | Postgresql 8.1.3 Debian installation encoding question |
| Previous Message | Andy Shellam | 2006-03-25 17:49:45 | Re: Renaming a sequence? |