From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oisin Glynn <me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] COPY command documentation |
Date: | 2006-03-23 20:12:50 |
Message-ID: | 20060323201250.GC6106@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:00:13PM +0100, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Oisin Glynn wrote:
>
> >I just discovered that the comments from 8.0 had the answer I was
> >looking for but these comments are not in the 8.1 docs. Should the
> >comments be rolled forward as new versions are created? Or if valid
> >comments added to the docs themselves?
> >
> >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-copy.html
> >
> >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-copy.html
>
> No, comments don't roll forward.
...and it's unlikely that they will, now or later, without somebody
whose whole job is to monitor those comments and make patches.
I'd like to make a Modest Proposalâ¢: Let's take down the interactive
documents and, in their place, put up a request that doc patches be
sent to -docs.
What say?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-23 20:14:17 | Re: [GENERAL] COPY command documentation |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-03-23 18:00:13 | Re: COPY command documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-23 20:14:17 | Re: [GENERAL] COPY command documentation |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-03-23 20:08:01 | Re: Hi, |