Re: have you feel anything when you read this ?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Eugene E(dot)" <sad(at)bankir(dot)ru>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: have you feel anything when you read this ?
Date: 2006-03-22 03:29:24
Message-ID: 20060322032924.GA2262@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 17:40:03 -0500,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Indeed. I wonder whether we shouldn't tweak the SQL string literal
> parser to reject \000, because AFAICS that isn't going to do anything
> useful for any datatype, and it leads to what are at best questionable
> results. (bytea's processing of \000 happens somewhere further
> downstream, and wouldn't be affected.)

I think that makes sense. That character is effectively not allowed in text, so
it shouldn't be accepted as input.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aftab Alam 2006-03-22 03:38:08 Re: Power cut and performance problem
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2006-03-22 01:03:02 Re: Using a parameter in Interval