From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type |
Date: | 2006-03-21 20:30:51 |
Message-ID: | 200603212130.52525.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This looks very interesting. Should we add it to the core
> distribution?
I think such types would be better implemented as some sort of
structured type, possibly with constructors and methods and all the
other stuff that SQL talks about. We don't have all of that yet --
maybe we don't need all of it immediately -- but before we start
endorsing many of these types I'd like to see some consideration given
to this issue.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-21 20:59:31 | Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-03-21 19:09:09 | Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 20:37:35 | Re: qsort, once again |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-03-21 20:17:19 | Re: qsort, once again |