Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Alex Hayward <xelah-pgsql(at)xelah(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
Date: 2006-03-21 12:34:17
Message-ID: 20060321123417.GW15742@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 12:22:31PM +0000, Alex Hayward wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:03:26PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > >
> > > So its really all about accounting, in a sense - whether pages end up in
> > > the 'Buf' or 'Inactive' queue, they are still cached!
> >
> > So what's the difference between Buf and Active then? Just that active
> > means it's a code page, or that it's been directly mapped into a
> > processes memory (perhaps via mmap)?
>
> I don't think that Buf and Active are mutually exclusive. Try adding up
> Active, Inactive, Cache, Wired, Buf and Free - it'll come to more than
> your physical memory.
>
> Active gives an amount of physical memory. Buf gives an amount of
> kernel-space virtual memory which provide the kernel with a window on to
> pages in the other categories. In fact, I don't think that 'Buf' really
> belongs in the list as it doesn't represent a 'type' of page at all.

Ahhh, I get it... a KVM (what's that stand for anyway?) is required any
time the kernel wants to access a page that doesn't belong to it, right?

And actually, I just checked 4 machines and adding all the queues plus
buf together didn't add up to total memory except on one of them (there
adding just the queues came close; 1507.6MB on a 1.5GB machine).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-03-21 12:45:25 Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2006-03-21 12:29:54 Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance