| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT |
| Date: | 2006-03-21 03:32:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200603210332.k2L3WCU16255@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are we agreed this is the way we want to control this?
>
> AFAICT, no one except Matt wants this feature at all, so I'd much prefer
> to drop the whole idea. I think it's a insufficiently justified kluge.
Fine. Unless I hear from the non-kludge croud, it is dropped. ;-)
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-03-21 03:34:33 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 03:30:39 | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-03-21 03:34:33 | Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-21 03:30:39 | Re: [PATCHES] PL/pgSQL: #option select_into_1_row (was SELECT INTO |