From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dan Harris <fbsd(at)drivefaster(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Help optimizing a slow index scan |
Date: | 2006-03-18 15:00:19 |
Message-ID: | 20060318150019.GA8398@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 11:50:48 +0300,
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
> I may be wrong but we in astronomy have several sky indexing schemes, which
> allows to effectively use classical btree index. See
> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/oddmuse/index.cgi/SkyPixelization
> for details. Sergei Koposov has developed Q3C contrib module for
> PostgreSQL 8.1+ and we use it with billiard size astronomical catalogs.
Note that Earth Distance can also be used for astronomy. If you use an
appropiate radius, distances will be in degrees.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | NbForYou | 2006-03-18 15:03:59 | database model tshirt sizes |
Previous Message | Antoine | 2006-03-18 12:01:24 | n00b autovacuum question |