From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Seperate command-line histories for seperate databases |
Date: | 2006-03-17 21:35:03 |
Message-ID: | 200603172135.k2HLZ3G28339@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > Chris Browne wrote:
> >> mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com ("Markus Bertheau") writes:
> >>> Any reason psql doesn't do this by default?
> >>
> >> I fairly frequently find myself accessing different (but similar)
> >> databases, and it's quite valuable to be able to submit the *same*
> >> queries to them.
> >>
> >> This change would make it troublesome to do that. I'd not be all that
> >> keen on the change...
>
> > Just what I was thinking.
>
> +1 on not changing the default behavior. However, this discussion
> makes me wonder just how well the hack recommended by the psql man page
> actually works. What happens if you use \c to change databases during
> a psql session? What *should* happen, if you're trying to keep
> per-database histories?
Unless we re-read .psqlrc (which I don't think we do), we will dump into
the original file.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-17 21:45:17 | Re: Automatically setting work_mem |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-03-17 21:07:37 | Re: Automatically setting work_mem |