Re: qsort, once again

From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jerry Sievers" <jerry(at)jerrysievers(dot)com>
Subject: Re: qsort, once again
Date: 2006-03-16 23:41:24
Message-ID: 200603161541.25929.darcy@wavefire.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 16 March 2006 12:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
> > I sent him a copy
>
> Thanks. This is really interesting: the switch to insertion sort on
> perfect pivot is simply not there in Bentley & McIlroy's paper. So
> it was added later, and evidently not tested as carefully as it should
> have been. At this point I'm more than half tempted to take it out
> entirely.
>
> So we still have a problem of software archaeology: who added the
> insertion sort switch to the NetBSD version, and on what grounds?

This is when that particular code was pushed in, as to why exactly, you'll
have to ask mycroft.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/stdlib/qsort.c.diff?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&only_with_tag=MAIN

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.

http://www.wavefire.com
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-16 23:48:09 Re: qsort, once again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-16 23:36:42 Re: qsort, once again