Re: Using materialized views for commonly-queried subsets

See also
http://www.jonathangardner.net/PostgreSQL/materialized_views/matviews.html

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:25:08AM +0000, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
> I typed up a description of a situation where the only viable option to
> improve performance was to use a materialized view, which, when implemented,
> was found to improve performance twenty-sevenfold, even with a fairly small
> amount of excess data (which is antipated to grow). I thought this might be
> of use to anybody else in a similar situation, so I thought I'd post it here.
>
> http://community.seattleserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=11
>
> Feel free to reproduce as you see fit.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Casey Allen Shobe | cshobe(at)seattleserver(dot)com | 206-381-2800
> SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461