Re: Baffled by failure to use index when WHERE uses a function

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Clive Page <cgp(at)star(dot)le(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Baffled by failure to use index when WHERE uses a function
Date: 2006-03-10 09:53:57
Message-ID: 20060310095357.GB25494@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:14:27AM +0000, Clive Page wrote:
> I have a table cov3 of about 3 million rows, with a B-tree index on an
> integer column called hpix. If I do a simple select on this column it
> works in milliseconds, using the index naturally:

<snip>

> So I would like to use this function to find rows, and I try for example:
>
> select * from cov3 where hpix = healpix(2.85,-11.48);
>
> but it takes ages. An EXPLAIN shows why, it insists upon a sequential
> scan:

<snip>

You don't describe the exact structure of your table nor the exact
declaraion of your function, but is it possible your function is marked
VOLATILE rather tha STABLE or IMMUTABLE?

> I am using Postgres 8.1.0 on Linux.

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-03-10 09:57:54 Re: Baffled by failure to use index when WHERE uses a function
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-03-10 09:35:52 Re: Baffled by failure to use index when WHERE uses a function