From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at |
Subject: | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... |
Date: | 2006-03-07 20:42:36 |
Message-ID: | 20060307204236.GH58405@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:39:55PM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
> > On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd personally be more interested in what the impact is on people not
> > > using synonyms. How free is any search for synonyms if you aren't using
> > > the feature?
> >
> >
> > Unless synonym enablement were a configurable parameter (which wouldn't
> > really make sense), the cost would be the same whether they're used or not
> > during searching.
>
> Right, but the response was that "using" synonyms incurred a cost and this
> should be documented. However, if there's a cost to people not using
> synonyms there's a higher barrier to entry for the feature.
Wouldn't the cost only be incurred if you searched for something in
pg_class that wasn't there, and therefor had to fall back to pg_synonym?
(At least I'd hope it was coded this way, but I didn't look at the
patch...)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2006-03-07 21:43:50 | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2006-03-07 20:39:55 | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... |