Re:

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2006-02-28 00:33:51
Message-ID: 20060228003351.GX82012@pervasive.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:57:27PM +0000, Guido Barosio wrote:
> Were do we finde accurate values, more updated ones?
> Guess we should measure current values and compare them later, in a few
> months after oracle dbms war gets quiet.
>
> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3462241

"In our survey, 90 percent of our developers work with or deployed to
Windows platforms," McKendrick explained. "Windows dominates this space,
and a database that doesn't run on Windows or doesn't run effectively in
Windows would have a fairly limited reach."

Does that strike anyone else as being *highly* skewed?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

  • at 2006-02-27 13:57:27 from Guido Barosio

Responses

  • Re: at 2006-02-28 00:39:16 from Marc G. Fournier
  • Re: at 2006-02-28 01:13:54 from Joshua D. Drake

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-02-28 00:38:38 Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Previous Message Guido Barosio 2006-02-27 13:57:27