Re: Wish: remove ancient constructs from Postgres

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wish: remove ancient constructs from Postgres
Date: 2006-02-27 03:20:30
Message-ID: 20060227032030.GA934@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 00:25:57 +0300,
Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/26/06, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> past'. Yes, standard is 'talkative', but I prefer only standard
> things, because it helps me to understand other databases and
> 'academical things'. Actually, I hate ':=', '::', 'INT2', etc, and
> really want to be able to deprecate them (via conf or something)

I find :: to be much more readable than cast().

> 3. 'Ugly' things like DISTINCT ON expression [, ...] (see
> http://chernowiki.ru/index.php?node=38#A13)

The alternatives to distinct on are painful. They are generally both harder
to read and run slower.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-02-27 05:53:09 Re: How to tell how much of the database is being used for data.
Previous Message Ken Winter 2006-02-27 02:58:54 Re: Another perplexity with PG rules