Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

From: James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, James Robinson <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hackers Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Date: 2006-02-26 18:30:12
Message-ID: 20060226183012.GB53835@lit.jwp.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:08:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> That design is broken on its face, as the system does not guarantee to
> call the validator.

Hrm. Other than language creations that do not specify a validator, at what
times will Postgres not call the validator upon function creation?
--
Regards, James William Pye

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2006-02-26 18:36:01 Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-26 18:08:52 Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?