Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net
Cc: ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
Date: 2006-02-26 14:40:13
Message-ID: 20060226.234013.82097837.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > > > But actually I'd argue that
> > > > > letting the client programmer supply the encoding is still a
> > > > > pretty dangerous practice. Your example demonstrates
> > that if the
> > > > > encoding PQescapeString is told is different from the
> > encoding the
> > > > > backend parser thinks is in use, problems result. Perhaps we
> > > > > should pass the PGconn to new-PQescapeString and let it
> > dig the client encoding out of that.
> > > >
> > > > Sound good to pass PGconn to new-PQescapeString. Here is the
> > > > proposed calling sequence for the new function:
> > > >
> > > > size_t PQescapeStringWithConn (const PGconn *conn, char
> > *to, const
> > > > char *from, size_t length)
> > > >
> > > > If this is ok, I will implement for 8.2.
> >
> > Here is the promised patches for 8.2. If there's no
> > objection, I will commit tomorrow.
>
> Just a reminder - to work on win32, the new function needs an entry in
> exports.txt.

Thanks. Could you tell me what the number column in the file is? Can I
assign arbitary number for the function? (maybe next to the last
number?) I'm not familiar with win32 build.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-02-26 14:40:33 Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2006-02-26 14:17:40 Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()