| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype p.tch #1 |
| Date: | 2006-02-25 16:47:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20060225164752.GA5602@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
> > Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
> > become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
> > this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
>
> I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA for existing tables
> if '-X ignore-existing-tables' is specified. I also updated the
> documentation.
Is this really an appropiate description for the behavior? What happens
if the table is not created for some other reason? Consider for example
a table using a datatype that couldn't be created.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-25 17:18:39 | Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, prototype patch #1 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-25 16:37:36 | Re: Resurrecting some old patches |