| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove ora2pg from contrib |
| Date: | 2006-02-24 23:52:41 |
| Message-ID: | 200602241852.41457.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 24 February 2006 18:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> Please kill it already. This has been discussed and agreed upon a number
> >> of times before, the last of which I even sent a quasi-patch to remove
> >> this particular entry.
> >
> > Actually, there are 4-6 more projects slated to get removed from contrib
> > per decision on this list; they're waiting for me to prepare a home for
> > them on pgFoundry.
>
> Right. The new information in this thread is that ora2pg should not go
> to pgFoundry because it's already got a home elsewhere.
>
That's not new, see the link I posted. It's just waiting on Josh or for the
task to be delegated.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Clark C. Evans | 2006-02-25 00:03:43 | constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-24 23:37:35 | Re: Remove ora2pg from contrib |