| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: List search broken? |
| Date: | 2006-02-24 02:02:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20060223215944.X1005@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:20:29PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Just curious, but if you search google, is it picking all the threads
>> properly? is it just search.postgresql.org that is losing the archives,
>> or all search engines?
>
> Google Groups seems to work; so does the site Oleg mentioned. From
> what I've seen only search.postgresql.org has a problem.
Right, but nether Google Groups, nor Oleg's site, search
http://archives.postgresql.org ... isn't there a way of telling Google to
search for results only on site http://archives.postgresql.org? What I'm
more curious about is whether there is a problem with the ASPseek stuff,
or is there a problem with archives itself that the search engines aren't
picking up those pages you mention are missing, altho they do show up when
one does a physical check of them ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-02-24 03:24:33 | Re: List search broken? |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-02-24 00:49:39 | Re: List search broken? |