| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: List search broken? |
| Date: | 2006-02-24 00:20:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20060223201943.K1005@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:21:35PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:56:29PM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>>> btw, you could always use pgsql.ru/db/mw
>>
>> Or groups.google.com, but the search function on the main site ought
>> to work. Failing outright might be better than returning a partial
>> result; at least you'd know something was wrong. I only noticed
>> that search wasn't working because I was looking for specific
>> messages that I remembered seeing and search wasn't finding them.
>
> ISTM this problem has existed forever, though I always just attributed
> it to me not being able to remember exact phrases. But maybe the search
> engine itself just has serious issues...
Just curious, but if you search google, is it picking all the threads
properly? is it just search.postgresql.org that is losing the archives,
or all search engines?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-02-24 00:49:39 | Re: List search broken? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-24 00:09:08 | Re: List search broken? |