From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Cruz <malebug(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Functions / PL-Language |
Date: | 2006-02-19 02:21:00 |
Message-ID: | 20060219022100.GA22477@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 04:48:55PM +0800, Jan Cruz wrote:
> > > Why does my stored function returns only the first row of the query
> > > instead of the whole set of query?
> >
> > Did you declare your function to return "setof <whatever>" ?
>
> I did but I don't know if I have to iterate/loop and use "return next
> setof_foo" or just use return next as it is.
Is the function SQL or PL/pgSQL? Here's an example of each:
CREATE TABLE foo (id integer, t text);
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (1, 'one');
INSERT INTO foo VALUES (2, 'two');
CREATE FUNCTION func1() RETURNS SETOF foo AS $$
SELECT * FROM foo;
$$ LANGUAGE sql STABLE;
CREATE FUNCTION func2() RETURNS SETOF foo AS $$
DECLARE
row foo%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
FOR row IN SELECT * FROM foo LOOP
RETURN NEXT row;
END LOOP;
RETURN;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql STABLE;
SELECT * FROM func1();
id | t
----+-----
1 | one
2 | two
(2 rows)
SELECT * FROM func2();
id | t
----+-----
1 | one
2 | two
(2 rows)
--
Michael Fuhr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-02-19 02:26:17 | Re: Mixing different LC_COLLATE and database encodings |
Previous Message | Bill Moseley | 2006-02-19 01:48:30 | Re: Mixing different LC_COLLATE and database encodings |