From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Date: | 2006-02-15 01:42:47 |
Message-ID: | 200602142042.47483.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 16:00, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that we increase substantially the FAQ entries
> > relating to patch submission. By we, I actually mean please could the
> > committers sit down and agree some clarified written guidelines?
>
> As I remember, there is a disinclination to increase the size of the
> FAQ very much. This suggests maintaining it as a seperate document. Or
> alternatively attach it as an appendix to the main documentation.
>
Huh? The current developers FAQ is at least 1/2 the size of the main FAQ. I
think adding a submission on patch submission guidelines is a great idea.
I'll have a patch based on Simon's post to -patches ready in the next 24
hours unless someone is really going to object.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-02-15 02:47:05 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-15 00:04:35 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-02-15 02:47:05 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-15 00:04:35 | Re: Patch Submission Guidelines |