From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Using stats_command_string for xact statistics |
Date: | 2006-02-13 19:02:33 |
Message-ID: | 200602131902.k1DJ2Xg11448@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I know we said we don't want to add an additional GUC variable just to
control xact statistics, but I am thinking that using
stat_command_string isn't a logical variable to use because it is
unrelated to commutative statistics.
I am thinking using row and block-level statistics to turn on xact
statistics makes sense, but not to use stat_command_string for that
purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Does anyone know why we test for pgstat_collect_querystring in routines
> that obviously dump only block and row-level statistics and database
> commit/rollback total? Is it a copy/paste error?
>
> Patch attached for review. The inclusion of pgstat_collect_querystring
> in these tests seems like a bug.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> Index: src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.115
> diff -c -c -r1.115 pgstat.c
> *** src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c 31 Dec 2005 19:39:10 -0000 1.115
> --- src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c 1 Jan 2006 03:31:24 -0000
> ***************
> *** 810,817 ****
> int i;
>
> if (pgStatSock < 0 ||
> ! !(pgstat_collect_querystring ||
> ! pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> {
> /* Not reporting stats, so just flush whatever we have */
> --- 810,816 ----
> int i;
>
> if (pgStatSock < 0 ||
> ! !(pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> {
> /* Not reporting stats, so just flush whatever we have */
> ***************
> *** 1224,1231 ****
> void
> pgstat_count_xact_commit(void)
> {
> ! if (!(pgstat_collect_querystring ||
> ! pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> return;
>
> --- 1223,1229 ----
> void
> pgstat_count_xact_commit(void)
> {
> ! if (!(pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> return;
>
> ***************
> *** 1256,1263 ****
> void
> pgstat_count_xact_rollback(void)
> {
> ! if (!(pgstat_collect_querystring ||
> ! pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> return;
>
> --- 1254,1260 ----
> void
> pgstat_count_xact_rollback(void)
> {
> ! if (!(pgstat_collect_tuplelevel ||
> pgstat_collect_blocklevel))
> return;
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-02-13 19:05:17 | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-13 18:45:55 | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-13 19:03:24 | Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-13 18:49:31 | Re: Free WAL caches on switching segments |