From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Krb5 & multiple DB connections |
Date: | 2006-02-12 20:29:02 |
Message-ID: | 20060212202902.GO4474@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
* Bruce Momjian (pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Is this something we need for 8.1.X?
Personally, I think it's a bug which should be fixed. I don't think
everyone agrees on that though and there are some parts which could be a
bit controversial. The main issue is that now the entire Kerberos
context is recreated on each connection. Now, it's really not all that
expensive generally but I can understand the preference to just reopen
the ccache when it changes. I tried to do that by just free'ing and
redo'ing the parts having to do w/ the ccache but it didn't quite pan
out right and I havn't figured out what I did wrong yet. The other
approach would be to actually track the cache name and check if it
changes. That's more difficult to do correctly across platforms though
I think.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-02-12 20:31:36 | Re: [HACKERS] slow information schema with thausand users, seq.scan |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-02-12 20:13:07 | Re: User Defined Types in Java |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-02-12 20:31:36 | Re: [HACKERS] slow information schema with thausand users, seq.scan |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-12 20:06:06 | Re: Krb5 & multiple DB connections |