From: | CG <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 x86_64 and 32bit shared objects |
Date: | 2006-02-07 20:02:11 |
Message-ID: | 20060207200211.73709.qmail@web32512.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> CG <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Being the novice that I am, I thought that 32bit and 64bit binary code
> > could be used interchangeably. Is there some incompatibility of which
> > I am unaware?
>
> AFAIK you can't mix the two in the same executable image. If you are
> stuck using a 32-bit-only library, you'll have to build all of the
> Postgres server as 32-bit. Note that this is probably not going to
> cost all that much performance-wise, so I wouldn't recommend expending
> any great amount of sweat to avoid it.
Hm. It looks like building 32-bit Postgres is going to be even uglier what with
all the libraries that will have to be compiled into lib32. It thought it would
be easy enough to CC=gcc32 ./configure --with-all-my-options ... Should I have
started out with a 32-bit Linux distro?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-07 20:11:41 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 x86_64 and 32bit shared objects |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-07 18:38:09 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 x86_64 and 32bit shared objects |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-07 20:11:41 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 x86_64 and 32bit shared objects |
Previous Message | Andrew Rawnsley | 2006-02-07 20:00:03 | Re: streamlined standby procedure |