Re: Storing Digital Video

From: Albert Cervera Areny <albert(at)sedifa(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Storing Digital Video
Date: 2006-02-06 08:30:30
Message-ID: 200602060930.31144.albert@sedifa.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

A Dimecres 01 Febrer 2006 01:32, Rodrigo Madera va escriure:
> I am concerned with performance issues involving the storage of DV on
> a database.
>
> I though of some options, which would be the most advised for speed?
>
> 1) Pack N frames inside a "container" and store the container to the db.
> 2) Store each frame in a separate record in the table "frames".
> 3) (type something here)
>
> Thanks for the help,

What if you store meta data in the database and use some PL/Python/Java/Perl
functions to store and retrieve video files from the server. The function
would store files to the files system, not a table. This avoids the need for
a file server for your application while making your relational queries fast.

Any experiences/thoughts on this solution?

>
> Rodrigo
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2006-02-06 20:00:12 Re: Default autovacuum settings too conservative
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-05 00:49:05 Re: Index occupancy