From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 |
Date: | 2006-02-03 18:40:01 |
Message-ID: | 200602031840.k13Ie1E26695@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > You'll still need to run the postmaster frmo pg_ctl to get the "run as
> > admin" part. The only part that could be moved is the Job Object for
> > management. And you're normally not going to need that one when you're
> > not running as a service. Maybe sometimes, but I doubt it's worth it. If
> > we could solve the run-as-admin inside the postmaster it might be
> > different, but AFAICS we can't.
>
> Yeah, I thought we'd agreed that the patch was fine as-is.
Fine. I just wanted to make sure the decions was being made in terms of
logic, rather than Win32 cruft avoidance. The previous discussion was
not clear on this point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2006-02-03 18:46:07 | Re: Passing arguments to views |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-02-03 18:35:28 | Re: Passing arguments to views |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-03 18:50:56 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-02-03 18:20:30 | Re: Multiple logical databases |