From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick Rotsaert <patrick(dot)rotsaert(at)arrowup(dot)be> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Date: | 2006-02-03 17:34:49 |
Message-ID: | 20060203093241.U59873@megazone.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Patrick Rotsaert wrote:
>
> >One question is what does the explain (without analyze) plan look like for
> >the above and are the row estimates valid in the case of one of the hash
> >plans.
> >
> >
> pointspp=# explain select trid, count(*) from pptran group by trid
> having count(*) > 1;
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> HashAggregate (cost=1311899.28..1311902.78 rows=200 width=18)
> Filter: (count(*) > 1)
> -> Seq Scan on pptran (cost=0.00..1039731.02 rows=36289102 width=18)
> (3 rows)
Hmm, if you do an enable_hashagg=false and then run the query (without
explain) does it work then?
> >Failing that, how many rows should the above return?
> >
> >
> That is exactly what I am trying to find out. I can only guess that, but
> it should not be more than a couple of 10k rows.
Okay, so it's unlikely to be a client side memory issue (if it were
returning alot of rows, that could also be an issue).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-03 17:42:56 | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Previous Message | Patrick Rotsaert | 2006-02-03 17:18:44 | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |