From: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Policy on schema-qualified names |
Date: | 2006-01-31 19:43:21 |
Message-ID: | 20060131194321.GA5959@mcknight.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:46:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The direction that we ought to be going in is to add separate fields to
> error reports that contain just the names of the relevant objects (without
> any other decoration). This is needed anyway to allow client-side
> programs to extract the information without having to parse human-readable
> text messages ... and IIRC it's required by some part of the SQL spec,
> too.
Agreed. I didn't know about that part but with this in mind it would be a
waste of time to check all of the the messages at this time and make them
conform in some way.
Thanks for the explanation,
Joachim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-31 19:52:05 | Re: VACUUM Question |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-31 19:11:51 | Re: Tab completion of SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION |