From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Milen A(dot) Radev" <milen(at)radev(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2195: log_min_messages crash server when in DEBUG3 to |
Date: | 2006-01-26 18:55:17 |
Message-ID: | 200601261855.k0QItHN13307@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I tried on CVS tip and don't see a problem. Which branch were you
> >> testing?
>
> > Uh, CVS HEAD. I put -DEXEC_BACKEND into Makefile.custom, and recompiled
> > and initdb'ed. I then modified postgresql.conf and set log_min_messages
> > to "debug5". Then stop and start the server. The server log looks like
> > the server is running, but you cannot connect using psql, so something
> > died.
>
> [ scratches head... ] I put "#define EXEC_BACKEND 1" into pg_config.h
> instead, and didn't bother to initdb, but otherwise the same. Wonder
> why it's not failing for me. Something platform-specific maybe?
I just tested again using your pg_config.h modification, and I still
get the failure, so perhaps BSD/OS and Win32 have similar issues with
our code.
Trimming off the environment output, attached is the log file with the
sig11/segfault failure.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-26 19:09:36 | Re: BUG #2195: log_min_messages crash server when in DEBUG3 to |
Previous Message | Taworn T. | 2006-01-26 18:41:27 | BUG #2216: Cannot unregister service |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-26 19:06:50 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-26 18:49:34 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo |